In a recent episode of Sidecar Sync, a fascinating concept emerged that perfectly captures the challenge facing association leaders today: the distinction between wartime and peacetime leadership. While most associations have been built for—and continue to operate in—peacetime mode, the rapidly evolving technological landscape demands a shift to wartime leadership. But what exactly does this mean, and why is it crucial for associations to make this transition?
Understanding Wartime vs. Peacetime Leadership
The concept, originally popularized by Ben Horowitz in "The Hard Thing About Hard Things," distinguishes between two fundamental leadership styles. Peacetime leaders excel in stable environments where gradual improvement and consensus-building drive success. Wartime leaders, on the other hand, thrive in environments of rapid change where quick, sometimes unpopular decisions are necessary for survival.
The Mathematical Reality: External vs. Internal Change
At its core, the need for wartime leadership comes down to a simple equation: when the rate of external change exceeds the rate of internal change, organizations begin their march toward obsolescence. This isn't just about keeping up—it's about survival.
Think about your association's pace of change compared to the transformations happening in your industry:
How quickly are your members' needs evolving?
- How rapidly is technology reshaping your field?
- How fast are you actually adapting in response?
Why Most Associations Are Built for Peacetime
Traditionally, associations have operated in relatively stable environments where:
- Long-standing traditions guide decision-making
- Consensus-building is prioritized over swift action
- Comfortable reserves provide a sense of security
- Change happens gradually through formal processes
This peacetime structure has served associations well for decades. However, it's increasingly becoming a liability in an era where change happens at an unprecedented pace.
Signs You're Still Operating in Peacetime Mode
- Your decision-making process prioritizes consensus over speed
- Changes require multiple committees and lengthy approval processes
- Your service standards haven't significantly evolved in recent years
- Innovation initiatives are optional rather than mandatory
- Your organization values tradition over adaptation
Making the Shift to Wartime Leadership
Embrace Decisive Action
Wartime leaders understand that perfect consensus is often the enemy of necessary change. While maintaining respect for organizational governance, they find ways to act decisively within their scope of authority.
Accelerate Decision-Making
In wartime, waiting for multiple committee approvals before taking action can be fatal. Look for ways to streamline your decision-making processes while maintaining appropriate oversight.
Challenge Comfortable Standards
What was acceptable service yesterday may not meet tomorrow's expectations. For instance, if your association still aims for 24-hour response times while members increasingly expect real-time interaction, it's time to rethink your standards.
Make Hard Choices
Wartime leadership often requires making unpopular decisions for the long-term good of the organization. This might mean mandating new training, restructuring departments, or abandoning long-standing but outdated practices.
Lead by Example
Wartime leaders don't just direct change—they embody it. This means developing new competencies yourself and visibly participating in transformation initiatives.
The Cost of Maintaining Peacetime Leadership
Continuing to operate in peacetime mode during wartime conditions carries significant risks:
- Declining member satisfaction as expectations outpace service delivery
- Reduced relevance in your industry
- Difficulty attracting and retaining forward-thinking talent
Vulnerability to more adaptive competitors
Moving Forward
The shift from peacetime to wartime leadership isn't about abandoning your association's values or mission—it's about ensuring you can continue to fulfill that mission in a rapidly changing world. This requires:
- Honest assessment of your current leadership style
- Recognition of the gap between external and internal change rates
- Courage to make necessary but potentially unpopular decisions
- Commitment to faster, more decisive action
The associations that will thrive in the coming years won't necessarily be the largest or most well-funded, but rather those that successfully transition from peacetime to wartime leadership when circumstances demand it.
Remember, the goal isn't to operate in wartime mode forever, but to be capable of shifting between peacetime and wartime leadership styles as needed. The most successful leaders will be those who can read the environment and adapt their leadership approach accordingly.
Are you ready to make the shift?
.svg)
